/ Motion Bank
/ focus

Global debate motion research

NekoTab Motion Bank: Search 36,898 debate motions across British Parliamentary, World Schools, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas, Policy and Asians/Australs.

NekoTab’s Motion Bank is built for debaters, coaches, adjudicators and tab teams who need real tournament motions with context. Research parliamentary debate motions, compare round trends, prepare cases, and discover motion sets by tournament, region, year and topic.

36,898 real tournament motions BP 20170 motionsWorld Schools 1887 motionsPublic Forum 104 motionsLincoln-Douglas 131 motionsPolicy 26 motionsAsians/Australs 11992 motions Topic, region, year filters 6 debate formats covered
Loading…
Sort
Loading motions…

BP, WSDC, PF, LD, Policy motions from real tournaments

NekoTab helps you research British Parliamentary motions from EUDC, WUDC and Australs; World Schools (WSDC) motions from national championships; Resolved: Public Forum and Lincoln-Douglas topics from NSDA circuits; Policy debate resolutions; and Asians/Australs rounds — all in one searchable database updated through 2025-2026.

How coaches and teams use this for prep

  • Filter by topic area (Politics, Economics, Social Justice, Environment) to study thematic trends
  • Browse by year range to compare how similar topics have been framed over time
  • Use the tournament filter to pull the full motion set from a specific competition
  • Open entries to inspect infoslides, difficulty signals and Gov/Opp burden analysis
  • Use round-type context to understand how finals motions differ from prelim rounds

NekoTab vs Debate Data and other motion databases

Debate Data is a respected BP motion archive, but it focuses on a single format and lacks tabulation tools. NekoTab covers BP, WSDC, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas, Policy and Asians/Australs, adds difficulty and bias data, and connects motions to a full free tournament management platform — making it the broader choice for coaches and circuit organisers.

Recent real tournament motions

  • Resolved: The United States federal government should establish national health insurance in the United States. — NSDA Policy 2026-2027 (2026)
  • Resolved: Democracies ought to prioritize the protection of civil liberties over national security. — NSDA LD 2025-2026 (2026)
  • Resolved: The United States is justified in using force to remove authoritarian leaders from power. — NSDA PF 2025-2026 (2026)
  • This house prefers a world in which heaven is still achievable after hell — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
  • This house regrets the rise of Pentecostalism in Latin America. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
  • This house would use the winnings to compete in jousting tournaments. — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
  • This house predicts that, a decade from now, freedom of expression at universities in the United Kingdom will be stronger, rather than weaker, than it is today. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
  • This house regrets the rise of working-class conservatism — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
  • This house regrets the medicalisation of psychology and mental wellbeing — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
  • This house regrets the significant long-term increase in negative emotional language in English-language popular music lyrics. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
  • This house believes that feminists in Peru should prioritize seeking accountability for Peru’s forced sterilization campaign (e.g., reparations for victims and their families, prosecutions of former senior government officials) over campaigning for other major contemporary sexual and reproductive rights reforms (e.g., expanded abortion access, comprehensive sex education). — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
  • This house supports open borders. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
  • This house believes that fourth wave feminism has done more harm than good — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
  • This house opposes businesses’ growing use of tiered loyalty programs. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
  • This house opposes the stigma against consensual romantic or sexual age-gap relationships between adults who are both at least in their mid-twenties. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
  • In response to the Trump Administration, This house believes that the European Union must unilateraly abandon its alliance with the United States — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)
  • This house supports the establishment of a Bicol Autonomous Region — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)
  • This house believes that professional sports teams should be penalized for offensive or harmful conduct committed by their fans (e.g., racist, sexist, or homophobic chants, as well as acts of violence) — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)
  • This house believes that Vietnam should align more closely with the United States and the Philippines in addressing disputes in the South China Sea, at the expense of undermining "Bamboo Diplomacy" — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)
  • This house believes that Pope Leo XIV should directly criticize President Trump’s decision to attack Iran — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)

Debate motions by year

2026 debate motions

  • Resolved: The United States federal government should establish national health insurance in the United States. — NSDA Policy 2026-2027
  • Resolved: Democracies ought to prioritize the protection of civil liberties over national security. — NSDA LD 2025-2026
  • Resolved: The United States is justified in using force to remove authoritarian leaders from power. — NSDA PF 2025-2026
  • This house prefers a world in which heaven is still achievable after hell — Lancaster IV 2026
  • This house regrets the rise of Pentecostalism in Latin America. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1
  • This house would use the winnings to compete in jousting tournaments. — Lancaster IV 2026
All 2026 motions →

2025 debate motions

  • This House believes that Bulgaria should adopt a progressive tax system — WUDC 2026 (Sofia)
  • This House prefers a world where all religions prohibited visual depictions of the divine over a world where such depictions were central to all religions — WUDC 2026 (Sofia)
  • This House, as the leadership of a major news organisation (e.g. The Economist, CBS, The Washington Post), would adopt moralised journalism as a stance — WUDC 2026 (Sofia)
  • This House believes that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's rise to power has been good for Saudi Arabia — WUDC 2026 (Sofia)
  • This House opposes the popularisation of social justice speak — WUDC 2026 (Sofia)
  • This House believes that it is in the interests of the American people for the US government to acquire golden shares in strategically important firms (e.g. NVIDIA, MP Materials, US Steel) — WUDC 2026 (Sofia)
All 2025 motions →

2024 debate motions

  • This House prefers secondary schools adopting a classical education model rather than a progressive education model — WUDC 2025 (Panama City)
  • This House opposes confidence culture — WUDC 2025 (Panama City)
  • This House believes that US involvement in Panama has benefitted Panama — WUDC 2025 (Panama City)
  • This House believes that feminists in Western Liberal Democracies should adopt reconciliatory rather than confrontational approaches in their advocacy — WUDC 2025 (Panama City)
  • This House believes that the student organisers of the July Revolution should not transition into formal political roles (e.g. run for elected office, form their own political party) — WUDC 2025 (Panama City)
  • This House supports the rise of specialised private equity firms and funds that focus on specific sectors or geographies — WUDC 2025 (Panama City)
All 2024 motions →

2023 debate motions

  • This House opposes the norm to prefer the natural to the artificial — Vietnam World Universities Debating Championships 2024
  • This House believes that education systems should over-inflate children's academic self-perception (e.g. providing overwhelmingly positive feedback, avoiding fail grades, etc.) — WUDC 2024 (Ho Chi Minh City)
  • This House prefers the integrated model to the specialty model — WUDC 2024 (Ho Chi Minh City)
  • This House believes that opposition parties in illiberal democracies should strongly pivot towards empowering women as the primary focus of their campaign — WUDC 2024 (Ho Chi Minh City)
  • This House supports the remilitarisation of Japan — WUDC 2024 (Ho Chi Minh City)
  • This House prefers reactive to proactive EMS enforcement — WUDC 2024 (Ho Chi Minh City)
All 2023 motions →

2022 debate motions

  • This house would allow democratic governments to overturn supreme court/constitutional court decisions with a simple majority in the legislature — Madrid WUDC 2023
  • This house prefers the quality of art being viewed as predominantly subjective as opposed to predominantly objective — Madrid WUDC 2023
  • This house believes that religious organisations should syncretise over remaining independent — Madrid WUDC 2023
  • This house supports the increasing prominence of data journalism at the expense of qualitative journalism — Madrid WUDC 2023
  • When they are not part of that religion, This house believes that feminists should refrain from critiquing widespread religious practices that have different rules based on gender (e.g. wearing of veils, separate prayer spaces, women on their period being forbidden from fasting, Iddah (waiting) period after divorce/death of a husband, etc.) — Madrid WUDC 2023
  • In developing countries with a history of ethnic, racial and/or religious tensions, This house prefers a change of power from dominant political parties — Madrid WUDC 2023
All 2022 motions →

Browse debate motions by format

BP motions

British Parliamentary debate motions from university and school circuits worldwide. BP motions use the THW / THBT / THP format and are debated in four-team panels across Opening and Closing Government and Opposition benches.

  • This house prefers a world in which heaven is still achievable after hell (2026)
  • This house regrets the rise of Pentecostalism in Latin America. (2026)
  • This house would use the winnings to compete in jousting tournaments. (2026)
  • This house predicts that, a decade from now, freedom of expression at universities in the United Kingdom will be stronger, rather than weaker, than it is today. (2026)
  • This house regrets the rise of working-class conservatism (2026)
Browse all BP motions →

World Schools motions

World Schools (WSDC) motions are used in school-level parliamentary debate, including prepared and impromptu rounds. These motions are debated at national championships and the World Schools Debating Championships.

  • This House believes that the Sri Lankan government should aggressively provide financial incentives for high performing school graduates to enter less lucrative fields for their university education. (2026)
  • This House as Motu would Steal. (2026)
  • In a world where both men and women were equally likely to do it, This House prefers a return to the norm of families in which one parent works and the other remains at home. (2026)
  • This House believes that the US government should outlaw lobotomies. (2026)
  • This House believes that “have it all” feminism has done more harm than good. (2026)
Browse all World Schools motions →

Public Forum motions

Public Forum debate topics are monthly resolutions published by the NSDA and debated in two-person teams at high school competitions across the United States. Ideal for researching PF debate topics by semester or year.

  • Resolved: The United States is justified in using force to remove authoritarian leaders from power. (2026)
  • Resolved: The European Union should establish a nuclear sharing agreement with France to create an independent deterrent capability. (2025)
  • Resolved: The United Kingdom should rejoin the European Union. (2025)
  • Resolved: The United States should adopt ranked-choice voting for its federal elections. (2023)
  • Resolved: The United States should end lifetime appointments for Article III judges. (2023)
Browse all Public Forum motions →

Lincoln-Douglas motions

Lincoln-Douglas debate topics are bimonthly resolutions focused on ethical and philosophical questions. LD debate is a one-on-one format emphasising values argumentation, widely debated in US high school competition.

  • Resolved: Democracies ought to prioritize the protection of civil liberties over national security. (2026)
  • Resolved: In the United States criminal justice system, plea bargaining is just. (2025)
  • Resolved: In the United States, the use of artificial intelligence technology in the criminal justice system is immoral. (2025)
  • Resolved: Government employees have a moral obligation to leak classified information to address injustice. (2023)
  • Resolved: It is unethical for individuals to consume the meat of non-human animals. (2023)
Browse all Lincoln-Douglas motions →

Policy motions

Policy debate resolutions are annual two-team propositions covering complex domestic or international policy. Policy debate (also called Cross-Examination Debate) is a year-long US high school and college format involving detailed evidence research.

  • Resolved: The United States federal government should establish national health insurance in the United States. (2026)
  • Resolved: The United States federal government should significantly increase its exploration and/or development of the Arctic. (2025)
  • Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase fiscal redistribution in the United States by adopting a federal jobs guarantee, expanding Social Security, and/or providing a basic income. (2023)
  • Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its security cooperation with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization in one or more of the following areas: artificial intelligence, biotechnology, cybersecurity. (2022)
  • Resolved: The United States federal government should substantially increase its protection of water resources in the United States. (2021)
Browse all Policy motions →

Asians/Australs motions

Asians/Australs motions come from the Asian Debate Championships and Australasian Debating Championships, among the longest-running parliamentary debate circuits in the world. These competitions attract university teams from across Asia and the Pacific.

  • In response to the Trump Administration, This house believes that the European Union must unilateraly abandon its alliance with the United States (2026)
  • This house supports the establishment of a Bicol Autonomous Region (2026)
  • This house believes that professional sports teams should be penalized for offensive or harmful conduct committed by their fans (e.g., racist, sexist, or homophobic chants, as well as acts of violence) (2026)
  • This house believes that Vietnam should align more closely with the United States and the Philippines in addressing disputes in the South China Sea, at the expense of undermining "Bamboo Diplomacy" (2026)
  • This house believes that Pope Leo XIV should directly criticize President Trump’s decision to attack Iran (2026)
Browse all Asians/Australs motions →

Parliamentary motion types explained

THW — This House Would

The most common BP motion type. Calls for a specific policy action or behaviour. Example: THW ban single-use plastics. Use the motion bank to browse thousands of THW motions by topic and year.

THBT — This House Believes That

Asserts a value judgement or empirical claim. Example: THBT economic growth should be prioritised over environmental protection. THBT motions dominate international circuit prelim rounds.

THP — This House Prefers

Compares two worlds or systems rather than proposing a binary policy. Example: THP a world with universal basic income over one without. THP motions are common in BP break rounds.

THR — This House Regrets

Expresses regret about a historical event, trend or cultural norm. Example: THR the rise of social media influencer culture. THR motions frequently appear in World Schools and BP finals rounds.

THS — This House Supports

Expresses endorsement of a movement, trend or actor. Example: THS the right of workers to strike. THS motions are common in rights-based and labour debate rounds.

THO — This House Opposes

Expresses opposition to a trend or movement. Example: THO the increasing privatisation of public services. Less common than THW/THBT but useful for training teams on complex burden structures.

Filter by motion type above to browse the full archive of THW, THBT, THP, THR, THS and THO motions across all debate formats.

Browse motions from major debate tournaments

NekoTab's database includes motion sets from hundreds of university, school and open circuit competitions worldwide. Here are some of the most searched tournament collections:

EUDC European University Debating Championships WUDC World Universities Debating Championship Australs Australasian Debating Championships WJDC World Junior Debating Championships WSDC World Schools Debating Championships Asian BP Asian British Parliamentary Championships IONA Islands of the North Atlantic Championships USUDC US Universities Debating Championship

Debate motion bank FAQ

What kinds of debate motions can I find on NekoTab?

You can find real tournament motions across British Parliamentary, World Schools, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas, Policy and Asians/Australs styles, with topic tags, tournament names and round context.

Can I search motions by tournament, topic, region and year?

Yes. The motion bank supports free-text search plus filters for motion type, format, level, region, topic area and year range so debaters can narrow the archive quickly.

Is NekoTab useful for BP, WSDC, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas and Congress prep?

Yes. NekoTab is designed to help debate communities research motion trends, compare tournament topics and prepare cases across major parliamentary and school debate ecosystems.

How is NekoTab different from Debate Data or CalicoTab?

NekoTab combines a searchable motion bank with free debate tabulation, public tournament pages, learning resources and open-source tooling. That broader footprint helps schools, societies and circuits use one platform for both tournament operations and debate prep.

Where can I find 2025 debate motions and topics?

Filter the motion bank by year 2025 to see the latest debate motions used in recent tournaments across BP, World Schools, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas and Policy formats. The database is updated continuously as tournament data becomes available.

Can I browse BP motions by topic area such as politics, economics or social justice?

Yes. Use the Topic Area sidebar filter to narrow results by category. NekoTab covers over 20 topic categories including Politics, Economics, Law, Social Justice, International Relations, Environment, Science/Technology, Criminal Justice, Medical, Feminism, LGBTQ+ and more.

What debate motion types are available — THW, THBT, THP, THS, THO, THR?

All major parliamentary motion types are represented. You can filter by THW (This House Would), THBT (This House Believes That), THP (This House Prefers), THS (This House Supports), THO (This House Opposes) and THR (This House Regrets) to find motions matching the style your team is practising.

Are there school-level (WSDC / World Schools) practice motions?

Yes. Filter by Format: World Schools and Level: School to access practice motions used at school World Schools circuits and national championships. These include both prepared and impromptu-style motions suitable for coaching sessions and team prep.

Can I find Public Forum debate topics by year or semester?

Yes. Use the format filter to select Public Forum and narrow the year range to find PF topics from specific seasons. This is useful for coaches reviewing past resolutions or debaters studying topic trends.

Does NekoTab have EUDC, WUDC and Australs motions?

Yes. NekoTab's motion database includes motion sets from EUDC (European University Debating Championships), WUDC (World Universities Debating Championship), Australs (Australasian Debating Championships), WJDC, WSDC, Asian BP Championships and hundreds of other national and open circuit tournaments. Use the search bar to pull the full motion set from any specific tournament.

What is the difference between BP motions and WSDC / World Schools motions?

British Parliamentary (BP) motions use a four-team format with Opening Government, Opening Opposition, Closing Government and Closing Opposition. World Schools (WSDC) motions use a three-person team format with one proposition and one opposition team. Both use THW/THBT-style phrasing, but WSDC often includes more value-based and rights-focused motions designed for school-level competition. NekoTab's motion bank includes both formats, filterable separately.

Where can I find Resolved: topics for Public Forum and Lincoln-Douglas debate?

NekoTab includes Public Forum and Lincoln-Douglas topics in "Resolved:" format as officially released by the NSDA and used in competitive circuits. Filter by Format: Public Forum or Format: Lincoln-Douglas to find current and historical Resolved: resolutions. For the official current season topics, the NSDA publishes them at speechanddebate.org.

Is NekoTab an alternative to Debate Data for motion research?

Yes. NekoTab covers all the same BP motions as Debate Data and adds World Schools, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas, Policy and Asians/Australs motions in one searchable interface. NekoTab also adds difficulty and bias analysis, topic categorisation, and integration with free tournament tabulation software — making it a broader tool for debate communities.