BP, WSDC, PF, LD, Policy motions from real tournaments
NekoTab helps you research British Parliamentary motions from EUDC, WUDC and Australs; World Schools (WSDC) motions from national championships; Resolved: Public Forum and Lincoln-Douglas topics from NSDA circuits; Policy debate resolutions; and Asians/Australs rounds — all in one searchable database updated through 2025-2026.
How coaches and teams use this for prep
- Filter by topic area (Politics, Economics, Social Justice, Environment) to study thematic trends
- Browse by year range to compare how similar topics have been framed over time
- Use the tournament filter to pull the full motion set from a specific competition
- Open entries to inspect infoslides, difficulty signals and Gov/Opp burden analysis
- Use round-type context to understand how finals motions differ from prelim rounds
NekoTab vs Debate Data and other motion databases
Debate Data is a respected BP motion archive, but it focuses on a single format and lacks tabulation tools. NekoTab covers BP, WSDC, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas, Policy and Asians/Australs, adds difficulty and bias data, and connects motions to a full free tournament management platform — making it the broader choice for coaches and circuit organisers.
Recent real tournament motions
- Resolved: The United States federal government should establish national health insurance in the United States. — NSDA Policy 2026-2027 (2026)
- Resolved: Democracies ought to prioritize the protection of civil liberties over national security. — NSDA LD 2025-2026 (2026)
- Resolved: The United States is justified in using force to remove authoritarian leaders from power. — NSDA PF 2025-2026 (2026)
- This house prefers a world in which heaven is still achievable after hell — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
- This house regrets the rise of Pentecostalism in Latin America. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
- This house would use the winnings to compete in jousting tournaments. — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
- This house predicts that, a decade from now, freedom of expression at universities in the United Kingdom will be stronger, rather than weaker, than it is today. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
- This house regrets the rise of working-class conservatism — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
- This house regrets the medicalisation of psychology and mental wellbeing — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
- This house regrets the significant long-term increase in negative emotional language in English-language popular music lyrics. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
- This house believes that feminists in Peru should prioritize seeking accountability for Peru’s forced sterilization campaign (e.g., reparations for victims and their families, prosecutions of former senior government officials) over campaigning for other major contemporary sexual and reproductive rights reforms (e.g., expanded abortion access, comprehensive sex education). — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
- This house supports open borders. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
- This house believes that fourth wave feminism has done more harm than good — Lancaster IV 2026 (2026)
- This house opposes businesses’ growing use of tiered loyalty programs. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
- This house opposes the stigma against consensual romantic or sexual age-gap relationships between adults who are both at least in their mid-twenties. — St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (2026)
- In response to the Trump Administration, This house believes that the European Union must unilateraly abandon its alliance with the United States — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)
- This house supports the establishment of a Bicol Autonomous Region — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)
- This house believes that professional sports teams should be penalized for offensive or harmful conduct committed by their fans (e.g., racist, sexist, or homophobic chants, as well as acts of violence) — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)
- This house believes that Vietnam should align more closely with the United States and the Philippines in addressing disputes in the South China Sea, at the expense of undermining "Bamboo Diplomacy" — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)
- This house believes that Pope Leo XIV should directly criticize President Trump’s decision to attack Iran — 6th City Youth Officials Nagueño Debate Competition 2026 (2026)
Parliamentary motion types explained
THW — This House Would
The most common BP motion type. Calls for a specific policy action or behaviour. Example: THW ban single-use plastics. Use the motion bank to browse thousands of THW motions by topic and year.
THBT — This House Believes That
Asserts a value judgement or empirical claim. Example: THBT economic growth should be prioritised over environmental protection. THBT motions dominate international circuit prelim rounds.
THP — This House Prefers
Compares two worlds or systems rather than proposing a binary policy. Example: THP a world with universal basic income over one without. THP motions are common in BP break rounds.
THR — This House Regrets
Expresses regret about a historical event, trend or cultural norm. Example: THR the rise of social media influencer culture. THR motions frequently appear in World Schools and BP finals rounds.
THS — This House Supports
Expresses endorsement of a movement, trend or actor. Example: THS the right of workers to strike. THS motions are common in rights-based and labour debate rounds.
THO — This House Opposes
Expresses opposition to a trend or movement. Example: THO the increasing privatisation of public services. Less common than THW/THBT but useful for training teams on complex burden structures.
Filter by motion type above to browse the full archive of THW, THBT, THP, THR, THS and THO motions across all debate formats.
Debate motion bank FAQ
What kinds of debate motions can I find on NekoTab?
You can find real tournament motions across British Parliamentary, World Schools, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas, Policy and Asians/Australs styles, with topic tags, tournament names and round context.
Can I search motions by tournament, topic, region and year?
Yes. The motion bank supports free-text search plus filters for motion type, format, level, region, topic area and year range so debaters can narrow the archive quickly.
Is NekoTab useful for BP, WSDC, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas and Congress prep?
Yes. NekoTab is designed to help debate communities research motion trends, compare tournament topics and prepare cases across major parliamentary and school debate ecosystems.
How is NekoTab different from Debate Data or CalicoTab?
NekoTab combines a searchable motion bank with free debate tabulation, public tournament pages, learning resources and open-source tooling. That broader footprint helps schools, societies and circuits use one platform for both tournament operations and debate prep.
Where can I find 2025 debate motions and topics?
Filter the motion bank by year 2025 to see the latest debate motions used in recent tournaments across BP, World Schools, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas and Policy formats. The database is updated continuously as tournament data becomes available.
Can I browse BP motions by topic area such as politics, economics or social justice?
Yes. Use the Topic Area sidebar filter to narrow results by category. NekoTab covers over 20 topic categories including Politics, Economics, Law, Social Justice, International Relations, Environment, Science/Technology, Criminal Justice, Medical, Feminism, LGBTQ+ and more.
What debate motion types are available — THW, THBT, THP, THS, THO, THR?
All major parliamentary motion types are represented. You can filter by THW (This House Would), THBT (This House Believes That), THP (This House Prefers), THS (This House Supports), THO (This House Opposes) and THR (This House Regrets) to find motions matching the style your team is practising.
Are there school-level (WSDC / World Schools) practice motions?
Yes. Filter by Format: World Schools and Level: School to access practice motions used at school World Schools circuits and national championships. These include both prepared and impromptu-style motions suitable for coaching sessions and team prep.
Can I find Public Forum debate topics by year or semester?
Yes. Use the format filter to select Public Forum and narrow the year range to find PF topics from specific seasons. This is useful for coaches reviewing past resolutions or debaters studying topic trends.
Does NekoTab have EUDC, WUDC and Australs motions?
Yes. NekoTab's motion database includes motion sets from EUDC (European University Debating Championships), WUDC (World Universities Debating Championship), Australs (Australasian Debating Championships), WJDC, WSDC, Asian BP Championships and hundreds of other national and open circuit tournaments. Use the search bar to pull the full motion set from any specific tournament.
What is the difference between BP motions and WSDC / World Schools motions?
British Parliamentary (BP) motions use a four-team format with Opening Government, Opening Opposition, Closing Government and Closing Opposition. World Schools (WSDC) motions use a three-person team format with one proposition and one opposition team. Both use THW/THBT-style phrasing, but WSDC often includes more value-based and rights-focused motions designed for school-level competition. NekoTab's motion bank includes both formats, filterable separately.
Where can I find Resolved: topics for Public Forum and Lincoln-Douglas debate?
NekoTab includes Public Forum and Lincoln-Douglas topics in "Resolved:" format as officially released by the NSDA and used in competitive circuits. Filter by Format: Public Forum or Format: Lincoln-Douglas to find current and historical Resolved: resolutions. For the official current season topics, the NSDA publishes them at speechanddebate.org.
Is NekoTab an alternative to Debate Data for motion research?
Yes. NekoTab covers all the same BP motions as Debate Data and adds World Schools, Public Forum, Lincoln-Douglas, Policy and Asians/Australs motions in one searchable interface. NekoTab also adds difficulty and bias analysis, topic categorisation, and integration with free tournament tabulation software — making it a broader tool for debate communities.